Bug 1911296
| Summary: | Review Request: python-enrich - Enrich adds few missing features to the wonderful rich library | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | chedi toueiti <chedi.toueiti> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | José Matos <jamatos> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jamatos, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jamatos:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-07-13 14:17:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
chedi toueiti
2020-12-28 15:28:32 UTC
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file is simple and correct. fedora-review has no complaint. The only quirk that I found in the srpm is the description a bit confusing. I suggest something like: python-enrich extends the python rich library... This can be fixed on import. The package is approved. @José First, thanks for taking the time to review this package. As for the description, I know it's a little bit confusing but the original pypi package name is simply enrich. I think most fedora python package user are in the know that the package name starting with python?- rarely reflects the original pypi name. (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-enrich |