Bug 191798
| Summary: | definition of %{_host} and co different in beehive and stock RPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh> |
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dcbw, mikem, nobody+pnasrat, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-07-31 16:01:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Is redhat-rpm-config installed in both cases? I(In reply to comment #1) > Is redhat-rpm-config installed in both cases? I really have no clue about beehive, but redhat-rpm-config was/is installed on the box that I tested rpm --rebuild on. Assigning to beehive guru, CC'ing plague and brew gurus. Is this still the case with current packages? I think it only happens with beehive. Latest rawhide gtk2 package (gtk2-2.10.1-1) that is built with brew (?) uses i686, which is the same definitions shipped with rpm. OK, closing, as beehive is retired. |
Description of problem: The definition of the macro %{_host} is different in beehive and RPM as shipped in Fedora Core. For i386, the beehive definition is i386-redhat-linux-gnu, while in FC's rpm it is i686-redhat-linux-gn Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): beehive ? rpm-4.4.2-24.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm --rebuild a package that uses %{_host} (e.g. gtk2). 2. Compare with stable's or Rawhide's version of the same package. Actual results: The will be different in some way. For the case of gtk2, the rebuilt package will contain a directory named /etc/gtk-2.0/i686-redhat-linux-gnu while FC's RPM will have /etc/gtk-2.0/i386-redhat-linux-gnu Expected results: They should produce the same results. Additional info: This results in broken functionality when packages assume that the definition of %{_host} is the same everywhere and result in unexpeted things. On my machine with a rebuilt gtk2, this resulted in breaking librsvg2 and libwmf's %post scripts which resulted in gnome-games not working. bug 143950 and bug 143547 are also related to this. FarsiWeb's internal reference: farsiweb #287, originally reported by Reza Mohammadi and Hessam M. Armandehi, fix by Roozbeh Pournader