Bug 191828
| Summary: | tux Missing BuildRequire on docbook-utils | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andreas Thienemann <andreas> | ||||
| Component: | tux | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dwmw2, mingo, pfrields | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-06-06 00:00:05 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 191529 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Andreas Thienemann
2006-05-15 23:28:04 UTC
Created attachment 129141 [details]
Patch, adding the missing buildreqs
This is failing with something else now: gcc -g -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -Wall -I. -DINTERFACE_VERSION=3 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -c tux.c tux.c:51: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'tux' tux.c:51: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'action' tux.c:51: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'req' tux.c:55: warning: return type defaults to 'int' tux.c: In function '_syscall2': tux.c:74: error: storage class specified for parameter 'nr_threads' tux.c:75: error: storage class specified for parameter 'shared_buf' tux.c:76: error: storage class specified for parameter 'shared_idx' tux.c:76: error: parameter 'shared_idx' is initialized tux.c:78: error: storage class specified for parameter 'max_module_idx' tux.c:78: error: parameter 'max_module_idx' is initialized tux.c:79: error: storage class specified for parameter 'handle_events_array' and on and on... glibc seems to have stopped defining _syscall2 in unistd.h Should tux carry a private declaration of this macro, or is this likely to come back in a glibc update? glibc never defined these, it is glibc-kernheaders that used to define them, originally to helplessly broken macros, later on to syscall function invocation. That's what apps should be actually using, not sure why glibc-kernheaders no longer defines that in <linux/unistd.h>. glibc-kernheaders is not intended for use by normal userspace programs. Applications should use the syscall() function which glibc provides. I think I've fixed this up. It's stalled on building for the s390 though. Other archs have now built successfully. fixed. |