Bug 192702
| Summary: | multilib -devel conflicts for libglade-java | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Component: | libglade-java | Assignee: | Stepan Kasal <kasal> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-10-06 08:45:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 192658 | ||
Jeremy, the python script that checks for conflicts reports some files that are marked with %doc as conflicting because these are generated with gjdoc and there is a timestamp in a few of the files. Is rpm smart enough to work around files in %doc or does this have to be fixed too? Thanks. Nope, doc files can't conflict either. The brp-java-repack-jars script, the updated zip creation and the updates to gjdoc should fix this. Stepan, I'm re-assigning this back to you so that you can test and rebuild for FC6. The spec was fixed so that source zips are identical on all platforms. |
The package contains conflicting -devel packages for multilib arches. libglade-java-devel-2.12.3-0.i386.rpm Preparing... ################################################## file /usr/share/java/glade2.12-src-2.12.3.zip from install of libglade-j ava-devel-2.12.3-0 conflicts with file from package libglade-java-devel-2.12.3-0