The package contains conflicting -devel packages for multilib arches. libglade-java-devel-2.12.3-0.i386.rpm Preparing... ################################################## file /usr/share/java/glade2.12-src-2.12.3.zip from install of libglade-j ava-devel-2.12.3-0 conflicts with file from package libglade-java-devel-2.12.3-0
Jeremy, the python script that checks for conflicts reports some files that are marked with %doc as conflicting because these are generated with gjdoc and there is a timestamp in a few of the files. Is rpm smart enough to work around files in %doc or does this have to be fixed too? Thanks.
Nope, doc files can't conflict either.
The brp-java-repack-jars script, the updated zip creation and the updates to gjdoc should fix this. Stepan, I'm re-assigning this back to you so that you can test and rebuild for FC6.
The spec was fixed so that source zips are identical on all platforms.