Bug 1929482 (lightly)

Summary: Review Request: lightly - A modern style for qt applications
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <eclipseo>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: José Matos <jamatos>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: jamatos, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jamatos: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-11 23:37:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-17 02:51:31 UTC
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/lightly.spec
SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/

Description:
Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-17 03:01:45 UTC
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62128182

Comment 3 José Matos 2021-02-19 08:40:13 UTC
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora.
The spec file is simple, very clean, and correct.

fedora-review complains:
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
  file-validate if there is such a file.

Basically we are the step as materia-kde, the desktop files are not in /usr/share/applications so there is nothing to see here.

So the package is approved. :-)

Comment 4 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-20 01:59:27 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Comment 5 Mohan Boddu 2021-02-22 22:55:30 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lightly

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 11:16:46 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0955b35a88 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0955b35a88

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 11:37:02 UTC
FEDORA-2021-4f9025c06a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4f9025c06a

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 16:59:30 UTC
FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 20:42:48 UTC
FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2021-03-11 23:37:56 UTC
FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2021-03-19 20:03:00 UTC
FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.