Bug 1929482 (lightly) - Review Request: lightly - A modern style for qt applications
Summary: Review Request: lightly - A modern style for qt applications
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: lightly
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: José Matos
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-17 02:51 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2021-03-19 20:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-11 23:37:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jamatos: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-17 02:51:31 UTC
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/lightly.spec
SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/

Description:
Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.Lightly is a fork of breeze theme style that aims to be visually modern and minimalistic.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-17 03:01:45 UTC
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62128182

Comment 3 José Matos 2021-02-19 08:40:13 UTC
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora.
The spec file is simple, very clean, and correct.

fedora-review complains:
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
  file-validate if there is such a file.

Basically we are the step as materia-kde, the desktop files are not in /usr/share/applications so there is nothing to see here.

So the package is approved. :-)

Comment 4 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-02-20 01:59:27 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Comment 5 Mohan Boddu 2021-02-22 22:55:30 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lightly

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 11:16:46 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0955b35a88 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0955b35a88

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 11:37:02 UTC
FEDORA-2021-4f9025c06a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4f9025c06a

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 16:59:30 UTC
FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-03-04 20:42:48 UTC
FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2021-03-11 23:37:56 UTC
FEDORA-2021-cdbad7899c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2021-03-19 20:03:00 UTC
FEDORA-2021-1e450bad3b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.