Bug 1933565

Summary: Don't BuildRequires xorg-x11-font-utils
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer>
Component: baekmuk-bdf-fontsAssignee: Peng Wu <pwu>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: andreas.bierfert, extras-qa, fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, jani, jgrulich, jreznik, kde-sig, me, m, petersen, pnemade, psatpute, pwu, tagoh, than, vishalvijayraghavan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-29.fc35 baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-29.fc34 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1933564 Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-02 10:37:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1932731    

Description Peter Hutterer 2021-03-01 05:52:21 UTC 
We need mkfontdir which is already a separate Provides by xorg-x11-font-utils. xorg-x11-font-utils is to be split up into multiple packages, see Bug 1932731, so let's get our BuildRequires to work smoothly across that change.

Suggested diff:
diff --git a/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec b/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
index 79fb20a..3849217 100644
--- a/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
+++ b/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ URL:            http://kldp.net/projects/baekmuk/
 Source:  http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1428/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz
 Patch0:         baekmuk-bdf-fonts-fix-fonts-alias.patch
 BuildArch:      noarch
-BuildRequires:  xorg-x11-font-utils
+BuildRequires:  mkfontdir bdftopcf
 Conflicts:      fonts-korean < 2.2-5
 
 %description


Verified successful build in a local F33 container with only the mkfontscale (Bug 1932734) and bdftopcf (Bug 1932736) packages installed, no xorg-x11-font-utils.
Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2021-03-01 12:58:57 UTC 
Why am I CCed on this bug? I don't comaintain this package. You added many unnecessary CCs.
Comment 2 Peter Hutterer 2021-03-02 00:38:11 UTC 
Urgh, I think that's a function of the clone bug feature, it just keeps stacking the CCs so if you were unlucky enough that I (randomly) picked one of your packages as initial one, you kept getting appended. Apologies for the noise.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2021-03-02 10:37:37 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-68f1fa8ccb has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-03-02 11:45:46 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-9660787a95 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9660787a95
Comment 5 Peng Wu 2021-03-02 11:52:14 UTC 
Okay, built the package for Fedora 34 and 35.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-03-03 15:46:04 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-9660787a95 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-9660787a95`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9660787a95

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-03-19 17:43:28 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-9660787a95 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-03-19 19:59:36 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-9660787a95 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.