Bug 1936887

Summary:	[RFE][Cephadm]: rgw-ha daemon in cephadm should allow choice of RGWs to be covered by HAproxy
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Tejas <tchandra>
Component:	Cephadm	Assignee:	Juan Miguel Olmo <jolmomar>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tejas <tchandra>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.0	CC:	agunn, bperkins, rlepaksh
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	5.1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-16.2.6-1.el8cp	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-04-04 10:19:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1895577

Description Tejas 2021-03-09 12:23:25 UTC

Description of problem:
   Cephadm has a provision to deploy haproxy and keepalive daemons over all the RGW daemons present in the cluster.
This works for single realm,zone setups where all RGWs are working for the same clients.
but for a cluster having multiple realms, covering a varied set of clients, we caanot have all RGW daemons covered by the same HAproxy.

Ref: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895577
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/rgw/#high-availability-service-for-rgw
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38166

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph version 16.1.0-486.el8cp (f9701a56b7b8182352532afba8db2bf394c8585a) pacific (rc)

Comment 1 Tejas 2021-04-01 11:30:09 UTC

*** Bug 1944651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Sebastian Wagner 2021-05-31 10:46:01 UTC

Are you sure about this? You typically have a cephadm service *per zone*. And each ingress services is linked to an RGW service.

Comment 13 Rahul Lepakshi 2022-02-08 05:42:22 UTC

Verified by Tejas

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 10:19:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174