Bug 1936887 - [RFE][Cephadm]: rgw-ha daemon in cephadm should allow choice of RGWs to be covered by HAproxy
Summary: [RFE][Cephadm]: rgw-ha daemon in cephadm should allow choice of RGWs to be co...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1
Assignee: Juan Miguel Olmo
QA Contact: Tejas
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1944651 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1895577
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-03-09 12:23 UTC by Tejas
Modified: 2022-04-04 10:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.6-1.el8cp
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-04-04 10:19:55 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:1174 0 None None None 2022-04-04 10:20:13 UTC

Description Tejas 2021-03-09 12:23:25 UTC
Description of problem:
   Cephadm has a provision to deploy haproxy and keepalive daemons over all the RGW daemons present in the cluster.
This works for single realm,zone setups where all RGWs are working for the same clients.
but for a cluster having multiple realms, covering a varied set of clients, we caanot have all RGW daemons covered by the same HAproxy.

Ref: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895577
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/rgw/#high-availability-service-for-rgw
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38166

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph version 16.1.0-486.el8cp (f9701a56b7b8182352532afba8db2bf394c8585a) pacific (rc)

Comment 1 Tejas 2021-04-01 11:30:09 UTC
*** Bug 1944651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Sebastian Wagner 2021-05-31 10:46:01 UTC
Are you sure about this? You typically have a cephadm service *per zone*. And each ingress services is linked to an RGW service.

Comment 13 Rahul Lepakshi 2022-02-08 05:42:22 UTC
Verified by Tejas

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 10:19:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.