Bug 1942748

Summary:	please build softhsm for epel8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	softhsm	Assignee:	Paul Wouters <paul.wouters>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	abokovoy, carl, crypto-team, jjelen, pwouters
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	softhsm-2.6.1-5.el8.1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-05-08 01:25:07 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 1942240

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-03-24 20:43:10 UTC

Please branch and build softhsm for epel8, as it's needed for building swtpm which we're also trying to build for epel8 (#1939674) and the version in RHEL / CentOS Stream is part of a non-default module stream (#1942240). I tested a mockbuild of the rawhide branch and it seems to work fine out of the box. Also happy to do this myself if you prefer, just add me a co-maintainer for the EPEL branch in case (FAS: dcavalca). Thanks!

Comment 1 Jakub Jelen 2021-03-25 09:38:36 UTC

I was not sure about the guidelines about EPEL 8 and other streams but as far as I see, we should be able to provide sofhtsm in epel8 as long as the package is not provided in the default stream (AFAIK it is only in IDM stream):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Policy

Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2021-03-31 21:32:22 UTC

paul@thinkpad:~/fedora/softhsm (rawhide=)$ fedpkg request-branch epel8
Could not execute request_branch: This package is already an EL package and is built on all supported arches, therefore, it cannot be in EPEL. If this is a mistake or you have an exception, please contact the Release Engineering team.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2021-03-31 21:58:10 UTC

Thanks, I've asked on #epel and it sounds like this warrants an exception, so I've filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10074 with releng.

Comment 4 Davide Cavalca 2021-04-16 15:10:50 UTC

The releng ticket has been resolved and the epel8 branch has been created, so we should be able to move forward here.

Comment 5 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2021-04-26 12:38:21 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 6 Davide Cavalca 2021-05-05 20:05:00 UTC

Any update on this?

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-05-06 15:54:16 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2065a75939 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2065a75939

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-05-07 02:17:35 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2065a75939 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2065a75939

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-05-08 01:25:07 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2065a75939 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Florence Blanc-Renaud 2021-09-24 14:16:38 UTC

*** Bug 1942240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***