Bug 194432
Summary: | qemu spec File: Incorrect BuildRoot Tag | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Gordon <peter> | ||||
Component: | qemu | Assignee: | Peter Gordon <peter> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | dwmw2, extras-qa | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-10-21 17:48:11 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Peter Gordon
2006-06-08 01:45:03 UTC
Created attachment 130719 [details]
This patch applies to the root qemu directory in CVS and fixes the BuildRoot tags on all four branches.
Ping? The FC-3 and FC-4 branches still need fixing to be in compliance with the Extras Packaging Guidelines on this. Thanks. Er...David? What is your status on fixing these? If I do not receive any update on this bug by Oct 22, 14:00 PDT (which gives you more than 36 hours), I will personally commit the fixed for these into CVS. Thanks. Sorry. Yes, please do go ahead and commit it if you have access. Why didn't you just do that in the first place, in fact? Thanks, David. I generally like to get an OK from the primary maintainer of the packageor know that he/she is not active before mangling with it myself. Fixed in CVS. Closing as WORKSFORME, since no new packages were built for FC3/4, so the CURRENTRELEASE/NEXTRELEASE options don't seem very sensible to me. Oh, I'm active, but I'm not going to be moronically territorial about it. It's easier for you to just do 'cvs commit' than to file a bug with the patch, even if I'm _not_ so busy that I end up ignoring it for months at a time (for which, sorry). And it's certainly easier for me -- it's the most sensible option all round. If we're talking about something that might be _contentious_, I suppose it might be different. But this doesn't fall into that category. |