Bug 1945934
Summary: | Maliit 2.0 released | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Markus S. <kamikazow> |
Component: | maliit-framework | Assignee: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | aperez, ibiam, jgrulich, pbrobinson |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | maliit-framework-2.0.0-1.fc35 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-06-30 16:00:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1977266 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Markus S.
2021-04-02 18:20:49 UTC
Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? Here is our bug for reference: https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/90 (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #1) > Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We > need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. Please do a PR and I will review it. > Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update > maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there any crossover between the two? Please also reach out to other users, at least the Sugar desktop uses it as well. (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #1) > > Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We > > need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. > > Please do a PR and I will review it. > Will do. > > Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update > > maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? > > I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there > any crossover between the two? > I assumed maliit-plugins is no longer a thing and instead we have maliit-keyboard, at least I don't see a new release of maliit-plugins, actually it looks the code hasn't been touched for 6 years. Anyway, I will keep it and create a new package for maliit-keyboard if you want to keep maliit-plugins. Here is the first change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 > I assumed maliit-plugins is no longer a thing and instead we have
> maliit-keyboard, at least I don't see a new release of maliit-plugins,
> actually it looks the code hasn't been touched for 6 years. Anyway, I will
> keep it and create a new package for maliit-keyboard if you want to keep
> maliit-plugins.
If it's not supported we don't keep it, my point is that a package rename vs a new package basically is the same thing so just do a new package review.
There are new package requests: 1) qt5-qtfeedback (required for maliit-keyboard) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977266 2) maliit-keyboard - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977283 (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there > any crossover between the two? The on-screen keyboard plugin was in the "plugins" package before. However, development of all plugins except the keyboard ceased and now only the keyboard is being developed. CC: suger packagers Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is a PR for it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #9) > CC: suger packagers > > Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is > a PR for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 Yes it's okay to update the maliit-framework, I'll change the library version upstream later. (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #9) > CC: suger packagers > > Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is > a PR for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 Yes it's okay to update the maliit-framework, I'll change the library version upstream later. Thanks. |