Bug 1958937
| Summary: | Allow users to add Sidecar feature gate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Container Native Virtualization (CNV) | Reporter: | Ruth Netser <rnetser> |
| Component: | Installation | Assignee: | Nahshon Unna-Tsameret <nunnatsa> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Inbar Rose <irose> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.8.0 | CC: | cnv-qe-bugs, fdeutsch, stirabos |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.8.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-05-13 11:30:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ruth Netser
2021-05-10 13:00:32 UTC
Fabian, we explicitly removed the sidecar feature gate considering it a secure hole.
The user can optionally enable it with kubevirt.kubevirt.io/jsonpatch annotation and this will taint the product with a condition like:
{
...
"message": "Unsupported feature was activated via an HCO annotation",
"reason": "UnsupportedFeatureAnnotation",
"status": "True",
"type": "TaintedConfiguration"
}
do you think we should consider the sidecar feature gate as a properly supported feature and expose and document an API for it?
The sidecar feature gate is not something that we want to officially support, it can still be enabled and tested/consumed using the kubevirt.kubevirt.io/jsonpatch annotation on HCO CR. Closing this as WONTFIX |