Bug 196599

Summary: xfsprogs 2.8.4 are released
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: xfsprogsAssignee: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: dwmw2, katzj, laroche, mgarski, peterm
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_tars/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-18 21:05:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 120622, 192755    
Bug Blocks: 150223    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Diff from xfsprogs 2.7.11-1 to 2.8.3-1 spec file
none
Diff from xfsprogs 2.7.11-1 to 2.8.4-1 spec file none

Description Robert Scheck 2006-06-25 18:22:31 UTC 
Description of problem:
xfsprogs 2.8.3 were released at June 21th, 2006 while Fedora Core Development 
still hangs around at 2.7.11.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xfsprogs-2.7.11-1

Actual results:
Patches and files for upgrade of the xfsprogs package are attached.

Expected results:
Upgrade to 2.8.3... ;-)

Additional info:
I added Florian as Cc - same procedure like in bug #185234 and #154323 :)
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2006-06-25 18:29:19 UTC 
Created attachment 131503 [details]
Diff from xfsprogs 2.7.11-1 to 2.8.3-1 spec file

xfsprogs-wrapper.h: attachment #131501 [details] (from bug #192755)
xfsprogs-2.7.11-mkfs-inode.patch: attachment #127452 [details] (from bug #120622)

BuildRoot was adapted to match with Fedora Extras Packaging Guidelines.
Finally,
I don't have a 64 bit system to test, whether 2.8.3 introduced any new multilib

problems...
Comment 2 Marcin Garski 2006-07-03 22:05:49 UTC 
Now upstream version of xfsprogs is 2.8.4 :)
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2006-07-04 10:36:07 UTC 
Created attachment 131897 [details]
Diff from xfsprogs 2.7.11-1 to 2.8.4-1 spec file

Jeremy, added you for Cc because nobody seems to maintain xfsprogs package or
having time to apply these changes...
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-05 13:19:33 UTC 
Committed, thanks for the patch
Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2006-07-11 20:57:44 UTC 
Reopening, because xfsprogs 2.8.4 are not in Rawhide and you reported multiarch 
problem on ppc64 at Freenode IRC...maybe resolved by hitting dwmw2 or so, IIRC.
Comment 6 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-18 21:05:59 UTC 
ExcludeArch'ing ppc64 for now (bug 199315) just to get this out