Bug 1967576

Summary: [RGW-MS][Versioning]: Deleting an object [with version-id null] from one site, does not delete the object from the other site.
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Component: RGW-MultisiteAssignee: Kalpesh Pandya <kapandya>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.0CC: akraj, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, ckulal, kapandya, kelwhite, mbenjamin, mkasturi, sbaldwin, smanjara, snipp, tpetr, tserlin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-19.1.1-25.el9cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Objects with null version IDs delete on the second site Previously, objects with null version IDs were not deleted on the second site. In a multi-site environment, deleting an object with a null version ID on one of the sites did not delete the object on the second site. With this fix, objects with null version IDs delete on the second site.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2303109 2303112 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-11-25 08:58:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2303109, 2303112, 2317218    

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2021-06-03 12:02:53 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 18 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2023-09-13 15:49:56 UTC
*** Bug 2109343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 Scott Nipp 2024-10-22 13:57:23 UTC
So it appears that this has been addressed for the upcoming RHCS 8.x release and I'm also seeing a reference that this is resolved for an upcoming RHCS 7.1 update.  Is there any intention on this making it into a backport fix for 6.x?  I have a case that looks to be running into this exact issue in a 6.1 cluster.

Comment 31 kelwhite 2024-10-23 15:36:01 UTC
Adding 03959809 as they are hitting the same issue. Is there a workaround for this issue? Any way we can backport this to 6.x?

Comment 34 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-25 08:58:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216

Comment 35 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-03-26 04:25:05 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days