Bug 1967576 - [RGW-MS][Versioning]: Deleting an object [with version-id null] from one site, does not delete the object from the other site.
Summary: [RGW-MS][Versioning]: Deleting an object [with version-id null] from one site...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW-Multisite
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 8.0
Assignee: Kalpesh Pandya
QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2109343 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 2303109 2303112 2317218
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-03 12:02 UTC by Vidushi Mishra
Modified: 2025-03-26 04:25 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-19.1.1-25.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Objects with null version IDs delete on the second site Previously, objects with null version IDs were not deleted on the second site. In a multi-site environment, deleting an object with a null version ID on one of the sites did not delete the object on the second site. With this fix, objects with null version IDs delete on the second site.
Clone Of:
: 2303109 2303112 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-11-25 08:58:46 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2024:10216 0 None None None 2024-11-25 08:59:04 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2021-06-03 12:02:53 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Comment 18 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2023-09-13 15:49:56 UTC 
*** Bug 2109343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Scott Nipp 2024-10-22 13:57:23 UTC 
So it appears that this has been addressed for the upcoming RHCS 8.x release and I'm also seeing a reference that this is resolved for an upcoming RHCS 7.1 update.  Is there any intention on this making it into a backport fix for 6.x?  I have a case that looks to be running into this exact issue in a 6.1 cluster.
Comment 31 kelwhite 2024-10-23 15:36:01 UTC 
Adding 03959809 as they are hitting the same issue. Is there a workaround for this issue? Any way we can backport this to 6.x?
Comment 34 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-25 08:58:46 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216
Comment 35 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-03-26 04:25:05 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.