Bug 1968641

Summary:	Review Request: rust-hyper-rustls - Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <eclipseo>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	eclipseo, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	eclipseo: fedora-review+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-06-11 19:28:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1966648, 1968630, 1968633
Bug Blocks:	1948875

Description Fabio Valentini 2021-06-07 18:06:52 UTC

Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-hyper-rustls.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-hyper-rustls-0.22.1-1.fc34.src.rpm

Description:
Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-06-11 06:26:57 UTC

 -

# ring is not available on ppc64le and s390x
ExcludeArch:    ppc64le s390x

I wonder if it wouldn't be more practical to define a %{ring_arches} macros with its supported arches in that ring package and use it in all subsequent packages as an ExclusiveArch


 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2021-06-11 13:56:21 UTC

Thanks for the review!

> I wonder if it wouldn't be more practical to define a %{ring_arches} macros with its
> supported arches in that ring package and use it in all subsequent packages as an ExclusiveArch

I've been wondering that as well ... I can try to add that macro with the next rust-ring update.

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34561
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34562

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-06-11 14:03:03 UTC

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-hyper-rustls

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-06-11 19:28:43 UTC

FEDORA-2021-f8f523b9f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-06-11 19:29:20 UTC

FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-154cc48752

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-06-12 01:57:21 UTC

FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-154cc48752`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-154cc48752

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-06-20 01:07:20 UTC

FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.