Bug 1968641 - Review Request: rust-hyper-rustls - Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS
Summary: Review Request: rust-hyper-rustls - Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1966648 1968630 1968633
Blocks: 1948875
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-07 18:06 UTC by Fabio Valentini
Modified: 2021-06-20 01:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-06-11 19:28:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabio Valentini 2021-06-07 18:06:52 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-hyper-rustls.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-hyper-rustls-0.22.1-1.fc34.src.rpm

Description:
Rustls+hyper integration for pure rust HTTPS.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-06-11 06:26:57 UTC
 -

# ring is not available on ppc64le and s390x
ExcludeArch:    ppc64le s390x

I wonder if it wouldn't be more practical to define a %{ring_arches} macros with its supported arches in that ring package and use it in all subsequent packages as an ExclusiveArch


 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2021-06-11 13:56:21 UTC
Thanks for the review!

> I wonder if it wouldn't be more practical to define a %{ring_arches} macros with its
> supported arches in that ring package and use it in all subsequent packages as an ExclusiveArch

I've been wondering that as well ... I can try to add that macro with the next rust-ring update.

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34561
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/34562

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-06-11 14:03:03 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-hyper-rustls

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-06-11 19:28:43 UTC
FEDORA-2021-f8f523b9f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-06-11 19:29:20 UTC
FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-154cc48752

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-06-12 01:57:21 UTC
FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-154cc48752`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-154cc48752

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-06-20 01:07:20 UTC
FEDORA-2021-154cc48752 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.