Bug 197216

Summary: [bn_IN]Incorrect glyph for conjunct
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Runa Bhattacharjee <runab>
Component: fonts-indicAssignee: Parag Nemade <pnemade>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ankit, b.rahul.pm, eng-i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-04 09:35:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Graphical representation of the correct and incorrect form of the glyph
none
Patch attached
none
conjunct sign with cursor position
none
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned after the glyph
none
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned below the glyph
none
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned in front of the glyph
none
Font file of Solved Cursor positioning problem none

Description Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-06-29 11:16:32 UTC 
Description of problem:

The glyph for the consonant conjunct consisting of U09B9 + U09CD + U09AC is
incorrect from the traditional written format.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to Bengali India locale from gdm
2. open gedit
3. press ctrl+space to activate scim
4. Choose M17N-bn-probhat from the scim toolbar at the bottom right corner
5. Press the keysequence h/b to write  the conjunct
  
Actual results:

incorrect glyph image. U09AC is at the bottom part of the conjunct glyph.
[bn-glyph.png]

Expected results:

U09AC should be attached to U09B9 in the right side oin the conjunct
glyph.[bn-glyph.png]

Additional info:

Attached image bn-glyph.png describing the problem
Comment 1 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-06-29 11:16:32 UTC 
Created attachment 131741 [details]
Graphical representation of the correct and incorrect form of the glyph
Comment 2 Darshan Santani 2006-07-21 14:56:26 UTC 
Created attachment 132817 [details]
Patch attached

Patch attached to resolve the issue. Requested glyph for conjunct, consisting
of U09B9 + U09CD + U09AC, has been added. Thanks
Comment 3 Satyabrata Maitra 2006-07-27 10:44:53 UTC 
Tested the bug. bug is Reproducing still. Even though patch developed, require
test rpm to test it.

Tested with:

gedit-2.15.4-1
m17n-db-1.3.3-14.fc6
fonts-bengali-2.0-1
Comment 4 Darshan Santani 2006-07-31 13:54:22 UTC 
FIXED in RAWHIDE. 
[fonts-indic-2.0-2]
Comment 5 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-01 07:29:09 UTC 
Created attachment 133372 [details]
conjunct sign with cursor position
Comment 6 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-01 07:30:37 UTC 
Created attachment 133373 [details]
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned after the glyph
Comment 7 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-01 07:31:23 UTC 
Created attachment 133374 [details]
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned below the glyph
Comment 8 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-01 07:32:08 UTC 
Created attachment 133375 [details]
conjunct sign with dependent vowel positioned in front of the glyph
Comment 9 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-01 07:35:08 UTC 
Tested. Found following errors:

1. Cursor position is incorrect after typing the conjunct [glyph1.png]
2. Depenedent vowel signs to be positioned after the conjunct are displayed in
the middle of the conjunct glyph [glyph2.png]

Notes:
Dependent vowel signs placed in front [glyph4.png] and below [glyph3.png] the
conjunct glyph are correctly displayed.
Comment 10 Darshan Santani 2006-08-01 08:38:35 UTC 
Runa, Thanks for the update and testing. I'll resolve this issue asap.
Comment 11 Leon Ho 2006-08-28 06:07:36 UTC 
LingNing, can you check if it is a pango problem?
Comment 12 Liang Zhang 2006-08-29 06:53:34 UTC 
ok, I will check it.
Comment 13 Liang Zhang 2006-08-29 09:35:50 UTC 
Runa, what are the components of the conjuctions in glyph1.png and glyph2.png?
Comment 14 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-08-29 10:17:32 UTC 
Hi,
The details are as follows:

Glyph1: U099C+U09C0+U09B9+U09CD+U09AC
Glyph2: U099C+U09C0+U09B9+U09CD+U09AC+U09BE

hth
Runa
Comment 15 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-10-31 07:57:10 UTC 
Runa, 
Is this problem fixed in FC6?
Comment 16 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-11-13 08:53:18 UTC 
Not Fixed in FC6.
Comment 17 Parag Nemade 2006-11-20 10:25:30 UTC 
Created attachment 141640 [details]
Font file of Solved Cursor positioning problem
Comment 18 Parag Nemade 2007-01-04 09:35:59 UTC 
Built and tested in fonts-bengali-2.0.8-1