Bug 1982286

This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71886219

Hey, Do you want to do a review swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994481 ? Since they're both golang packages it seems apt.

Yeah sure

go2rpm package, so nice and easy. approved.

[NOTE] Lots of other packages own /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com, so while
fedora-review marked it as fail it's fine. Can't be fixed here anyway.

[NOTE] "Dist tag is present." Was listed as an issue, but since you're using
rpmautospec %autorelease, it's a pass.

[NOTE] rpmlint errors on golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource.x86_64
can be ignored. Not something that can be fixed here.


Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
=======


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/admin/fedora-
     review/1982286-golang-github-path-network-mmproxy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by other packages:
     /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in go-
     mmproxy , golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
[x]: Dist tag is present.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: go-mmproxy-2.1-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel-2.1-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
          golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource-2.1-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-2.1-1.fc36.src.rpm
go-mmproxy.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Golang -> Golan, Golan g, Angolan
go-mmproxy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary go-mmproxy
golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/path-network/go-mmproxy/.goipath
golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package golang-github-path-network-mmproxy.
golang-github-path-network-mmproxy.src:67: W: macro-in-%changelog %autochangelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/path-network/go-mmproxy/archive/2.1/go-mmproxy-2.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : e16ac0584c875b0f97ae86b6cb3c763714a23d9f5fca0dd9eacad12bc39ad3af
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e16ac0584c875b0f97ae86b6cb3c763714a23d9f5fca0dd9eacad12bc39ad3af


Requires
--------
go-mmproxy (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)

golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    go-filesystem
    golang(go.uber.org/zap)

golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
go-mmproxy:
    go-mmproxy
    go-mmproxy(x86-64)

golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel:
    golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-devel
    golang-ipath(github.com/path-network/go-mmproxy)
    golang-ipath(github.com/path-network/go-mmproxy)(tag=2.1)

golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource:
    golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource
    golang-github-path-network-mmproxy-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1982286
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Perl, Java, Haskell, Python, Ocaml, PHP, SugarActivity, C/C++, fonts, R
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Thanks!

$ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-path-network-mmproxy 1982286
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36463

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-path-network-mmproxy

FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f

FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-2021-9274c8587f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.