Bug 1982777

Summary:	Please branch and build usrsctp for EPEL8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	usrsctp	Assignee:	Vitaly <vitaly>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	vitaly
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	usrsctp-0.9.5.0-2.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-07-15 17:00:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-07-15 16:47:17 UTC

Hi,

I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 
repository. I am interested in seeing usrsctp added to EPEL 8.

Would it be possible for you to maintain the package? While EPEL 
is more conservative in package maintenance[2][3], it does allow for
updates to later versions when needed.

I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig), that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

The EPEL team appreciate your help with EPEL.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Packagers

Comment 1 Vitaly 2021-07-15 17:00:00 UTC

> I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 

Sorry, but I'm not interested in EPEL packaging.

> I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig)

Added dcavalca and epel-packagers-sig.

> that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

But please don't commit "if %{epel}" to Fedora branches. Use epel* instead.

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2021-07-15 17:11:15 UTC

Sure thing, thanks for the prompt reply! I've requested the epel8 branch in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35764

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2021-07-15 17:54:34 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-07-16 01:36:17 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-07-17 00:31:09 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.