Bug 1982777 - Please branch and build usrsctp for EPEL8
Summary: Please branch and build usrsctp for EPEL8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: usrsctp
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vitaly
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-15 16:47 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2021-07-17 00:31 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: usrsctp-0.9.5.0-2.el8
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-15 17:00:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-07-15 16:47:17 UTC
Hi,

I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 
repository. I am interested in seeing usrsctp added to EPEL 8.

Would it be possible for you to maintain the package? While EPEL 
is more conservative in package maintenance[2][3], it does allow for
updates to later versions when needed.

I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig), that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

The EPEL team appreciate your help with EPEL.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Packagers

Comment 1 Vitaly 2021-07-15 17:00:00 UTC
> I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 

Sorry, but I'm not interested in EPEL packaging.

> I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig)

Added dcavalca and epel-packagers-sig.

> that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

But please don't commit "if %{epel}" to Fedora branches. Use epel* instead.

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2021-07-15 17:11:15 UTC
Sure thing, thanks for the prompt reply! I've requested the epel8 branch in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35764

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2021-07-15 17:54:34 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-07-16 01:36:17 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2021-07-17 00:31:09 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-247500b671 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.