Bug 198380
Summary: | Package kexec-tools lacks IPv6 support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Vrabec <pvrabec> |
Component: | kexec-tools | Assignee: | Neil Horman <nhorman> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mbacovsk |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-11 11:35:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 195271 |
Description
Peter Vrabec
2006-07-11 10:21:16 UTC
This should be ok for this package. That function only uses a socket to set interface flags for interface that need the IFF_UP flag cleared. It doesn't actually need to send/receive any network data. This could be done more generically with netlink or raw sockets, but at the moment IPV6 support isn't in any way needed in this package I think the idea is not that ipv6 is not needed but that ipv6 support is wanted Actually it is you who is missing my point, although as I re-read my comments I could have made them more clearly. That socket creation refereced above uses AF_INET to do its work, but it could just as easily use AF_INET6, AF_RAW, etc. The only work that socket does is to change interface flags. It conducts no network communitcation at all. As such we could change it to use a different protocol, or add protocols over which that socket did its work, but to do so would be pointless, since that sockets actions are protocol agnostic. |