Bug 198586
Summary: | Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jarod Wilson <jarod> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-28 13:13:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Jarod Wilson
2006-07-12 03:35:49 UTC
My only concern is the description; I'm not sure it's really relevant to mention that the source will compile on OpenBSD, or to mention the isic URL when isic is already in extras. I'll leave it to you to decide what you want to do. Review: * source files match upstream: b545715256f9c362703754a894fe9093 ip6sic-0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ip6sic = 0.1-1.fc6 = libdnet >= 1.1.0 libdnet.so.1()(64bit) libpcap >= 0.4 libpcap.so.0.9.4()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED The description was basically a simple copy-n-paste off the project page, but yeah, I suppose we don't really give a rip that it builds on OpenBSD. I'm importing a -2 revision with a sanitized description. Building for devel as I type, branching for FC5 requested. Built for FC5, closing ticket. (In reply to comment #3) > Built for FC5, closing ticket. Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks. |