|Summary:||Interfaces get mixed up when using ccwgroups and ONBOOT=no|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4||Reporter:||Bastien Nocera <bnocera>|
|Component:||initscripts||Assignee:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Brock Organ <borgan>|
|Version:||4.0||CC:||benl, mitr, rvokal, tao|
|Fixed In Version:||RHBA-2007-0303||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-05-01 17:29:54 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||198694, 202218, 234547|
Description Bastien Nocera 2006-07-17 14:32:07 UTC
initscripts-7.93.24.EL-1.1 On zSeries, using qeth interfaces 1. Set up 3 interfaces (eth0, eth1, eth2) 2. Setup eth0 and eth2 to be ONBOOT=yes 3. Setup eth1 to be ONBOOT=no 4. See that /proc/qeth shows eth0 and eth1 as being setup, instead of eth0, eth1 and eth2 (eth1 is initialised, but not up) The attached patches from firstname.lastname@example.org fix the problem
Comment 1 Bastien Nocera 2006-07-17 14:32:08 UTC
Created attachment 132547 [details] initscripts-s390x-onboot-qeth.patch
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-24 16:09:18 UTC
Realistically, this should all be udev rules... it should see the qeth devices on boot, load the appropriate module, and a udev script should configure the devices.
Comment 9 RHEL Product and Program Management 2006-08-18 15:08:12 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Comment 12 Bill Nottingham 2006-12-07 22:27:27 UTC
Created attachment 143097 [details] patch for this issue Please test that this works for you - this works for me in testing the scenario mentioned above. This is what I'm planning to commit for 7.93.26.EL-1 and later.
Comment 17 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-05-01 17:29:54 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0303.html