Bug 1996550

Summary:	tin-2.6.0 is available
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component:	tin	Assignee:	Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	adrian, dominik
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	tin-2.6.0-4.fc35	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-11-14 04:06:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2021-08-23 08:06:12 UTC

Latest upstream release: 2.6.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.4.5-6.fc35
URL: http://www.tin.org/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4972/

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2021-08-23 08:06:21 UTC

An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry!

Comment 2 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2021-11-05 22:58:36 UTC

Could you backport to F35? I've worked around the gpg1 failure and re-enabled PGP signature verification in rawhide. Turns out it's a bug in libusb.

Alternatively, I can do the backport. I'll assume I can do it if you don't answer by next Nov 12th.

Comment 3 Adrian Reber 2021-11-06 08:45:00 UTC

(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #2)
> Could you backport to F35? I've worked around the gpg1 failure and
> re-enabled PGP signature verification in rawhide. Turns out it's a bug in
> libusb.
> 
> Alternatively, I can do the backport. I'll assume I can do it if you don't
> answer by next Nov 12th.

Please do the backport yourself. I am not using tin anymore and it seems you are using it still, so you can change whatever you feel is necessary.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-11-06 21:12:54 UTC

FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9

Comment 5 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2021-11-06 21:15:47 UTC

(In reply to Adrian Reber from comment #3)
> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #2)
[...]
> > Alternatively, I can do the backport. I'll assume I can do it if you don't
> > answer by next Nov 12th.
> 
> Please do the backport yourself.

Done.

> I am not using tin anymore and it seems you
> are using it still, so you can change whatever you feel is necessary.

Got it. Indeed, I'm still using it almost every day. Why don't you make
me the main admin for the package so that bugs get assigned to me as well?

Comment 6 Adrian Reber 2021-11-06 22:24:02 UTC

> > I am not using tin anymore and it seems you
> > are using it still, so you can change whatever you feel is necessary.
> 
> Got it. Indeed, I'm still using it almost every day. Why don't you make
> me the main admin for the package so that bugs get assigned to me as well?

Done

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2021-11-07 00:08:23 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-11-07 02:09:54 UTC

FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-11-14 04:06:56 UTC

FEDORA-2021-2800f5fdd9 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.