Bug 1997540
| Summary: | Missing kcs: OpenShift Virtualization limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Container Native Virtualization (CNV) | Reporter: | Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch> |
| Component: | Virtualization | Assignee: | Jean-Francois Saucier <jsaucier> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Kedar Bidarkar <kbidarka> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 4.8.0 | CC: | cnv-qe-bugs, ctomasko, dholler, jsaucier, kbidarka, lmandavi, pousley, vfarias, ycui |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.10.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-02-22 21:42:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Fabian Deutsch
2021-08-25 13:03:08 UTC
Just to put the kbase draft here : https://access.redhat.com/articles/6571671 With the KCS draft available, I've created a PR to point the OCP V docs to this new kcs: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/39886 @ctomasko who can help to review the PR? As agreed with @mtessun the goal is to replace the in-docs scale and limits section with a pointer to the KCS https://access.redhat.com/articles/6571671. Similar to how it is done in the RHV Planning guide section 2.2. See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/pdf/planning_and_prerequisites_guide/red_hat_virtualization-4.4-planning_and_prerequisites_guide-en-us.pdf @jsaucier and @fdeutsch I'll clone this bug and assign the issue to Lavanya. You can contact her to review the PR. I have opened the following PR for the doc update (based on Fabian's submission): https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/40294 Fabian, please review when you can. Thanks! The PR looks good. But one thing that you identified, Pan, is something we need to address: All OCP V docs should point to this KCS; but the KCS does not differentiate between the versions, this can lead to confusion. Let me work with @jsaucier to consider to rework the kcs to include the OCP versions, then we should be good to proceed with this PR. https://access.redhat.com/articles/6571671 got updated and is now version specific, thus we can proceed with the PR, I'll comment there. PR lgtm, it should be applied to 4.9 and 4.10 branches KCS looks good and is published. PR still pending (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #16) > KCS looks good and is published. > PR still pending I have requested that @kbidarka review the PR from the QE perspective before I merge. Kedar, please take a look when you are able: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/40294 Thanks! Thanks for the review, Kedar! I have merged and cherrypicked the PR to 4.9 and 4.10. The changes will be live soon. Provided LGTM on the above PR. @ @pousley - In looking through the comments, I am noting that you completed the content development associated with this defect. Defect is currently in Verified state. Can you please move it to Release_Pending state when it is appropriate. Originally, I was assigned with the defect, but I believe you had ownership and completed it. Thanks! The KCS that Jean-Francois created[1] is published and the link[2] is live in the docs. [1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/6571671 [2] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/virt/install/virt-planning-environment-object-maximums.html IMO, this can be closed CURRENTRELEASE but I'm checking with Jean-Francois first because the bug is assigned to him. Thanks for the reminder, Lavanya! |