Bug 1998174

Summary:	Create storageclass gp3-csi after install ocp cluster on aws
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Chao Yang <chaoyang>
Component:	Storage	Assignee:	Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Storage sub component:	Operators	QA Contact:	Penghao Wang <pewang>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	medium
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	aos-bugs, grodrigu, jsafrane, wduan
Version:	4.9
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.10.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	4.10	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-03-10 16:05:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Chao Yang 2021-08-26 14:09:08 UTC

Description of problem:
Found that upstream has support gp3 as default volume, we can update storageclass gp2-csi
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-08-25-185404

How reproducible:
Always

Actual results:


Expected results:
Create storageclass gp3csi 
Master Log:

Node Log (of failed PODs):

PV Dump:

PVC Dump:

StorageClass Dump (if StorageClass used by PV/PVC):

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2021-08-27 14:21:40 UTC

We could create gp3-csi instead of gp2-csi in the CSI driver operator. It will not be the default one (at least until CSI migration is GA). I'd wait for 4.10 with that, 4.9 is pretty late in dev. process now.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2021-09-07 12:12:48 UTC

(In reply to Jan Safranek from comment #1)
> We could create gp3-csi instead of gp2-csi in the CSI driver operator. It
> will not be the default one (at least until CSI migration is GA).

I have a second thought about this. We should probably ship both csi-gp3 and csi-gp2, just in case someone depends on csi-gp2.

Comment 37 Penghao Wang 2021-09-17 13:15:43 UTC

Verified pass 4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-09-17-053541

Comment 38 Greg Rodriguez II 2021-12-13 21:22:09 UTC

Is there any possibility of this being enabled in 4.9?  I see internal updates showing previous testing but no confirmation of validity.

Comment 39 Jan Safranek 2021-12-14 08:40:51 UTC

It's enabled only in 4.10. Users are free to create their gp3 storage class manually in 4.9, gp3 it's supported there.

Comment 42 errata-xmlrpc 2022-03-10 16:05:54 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056