Bug 1998174 - Create storageclass gp3-csi after install ocp cluster on aws
Summary: Create storageclass gp3-csi after install ocp cluster on aws
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Storage
Version: 4.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.10.0
Assignee: Jan Safranek
QA Contact: Penghao Wang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-08-26 14:09 UTC by Chao Yang
Modified: 2022-03-10 16:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.10
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-10 16:05:54 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator pull 140 0 None None None 2021-09-07 12:13:16 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:0056 0 None None None 2022-03-10 16:06:11 UTC

Description Chao Yang 2021-08-26 14:09:08 UTC
Description of problem:
Found that upstream has support gp3 as default volume, we can update storageclass gp2-csi
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-08-25-185404

How reproducible:
Always

Actual results:


Expected results:
Create storageclass gp3csi 
Master Log:

Node Log (of failed PODs):

PV Dump:

PVC Dump:

StorageClass Dump (if StorageClass used by PV/PVC):

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2021-08-27 14:21:40 UTC
We could create gp3-csi instead of gp2-csi in the CSI driver operator. It will not be the default one (at least until CSI migration is GA). I'd wait for 4.10 with that, 4.9 is pretty late in dev. process now.

Comment 2 Jan Safranek 2021-09-07 12:12:48 UTC
(In reply to Jan Safranek from comment #1)
> We could create gp3-csi instead of gp2-csi in the CSI driver operator. It
> will not be the default one (at least until CSI migration is GA).

I have a second thought about this. We should probably ship both csi-gp3 and csi-gp2, just in case someone depends on csi-gp2.

Comment 37 Penghao Wang 2021-09-17 13:15:43 UTC
Verified pass 4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-09-17-053541

Comment 38 Greg Rodriguez II 2021-12-13 21:22:09 UTC
Is there any possibility of this being enabled in 4.9?  I see internal updates showing previous testing but no confirmation of validity.

Comment 39 Jan Safranek 2021-12-14 08:40:51 UTC
It's enabled only in 4.10. Users are free to create their gp3 storage class manually in 4.9, gp3 it's supported there.

Comment 42 errata-xmlrpc 2022-03-10 16:05:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.