Bug 200346

Summary: installs two boot entries for the same kernel
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-31 20:19:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150224    
Attachments:
Description Flags
install.log
none
anaconda.log
none
anaconda.xlog
none
anaconda.syslog none

Description Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 01:10:25 UTC
Installing on a Thinkpad T40p today, I get:

Fedora Core (2.6.17-1.2449.fc6)
Fedora Core-up (2.6.17-1.2449.fc6)

in grub.

rawhide-20060726

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 16:47:44 UTC
That's ... odd.  Can you attach /root/anaconda.log and /var/log/anaconda*

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 17:05:27 UTC
Created attachment 133172 [details]
install.log

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 17:06:26 UTC
Created attachment 133173 [details]
anaconda.log

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 17:07:06 UTC
Created attachment 133174 [details]
anaconda.xlog

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 17:07:45 UTC
Created attachment 133176 [details]
anaconda.syslog

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 17:18:05 UTC
Looking at anaconda.log, it appeared to add the kernel twice to the transaction
set - perhaps because I had kernel in %packages?


Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 17:30:55 UTC
Maybe.  Although I can't see why that would do it either :/

Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 22:00:03 UTC
Confirmed on a second box - UP box + kernel in %packages == two entries.

Comment 9 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 22:04:48 UTC
That seems like the obvious reproducer.  Throwing on the blocker list so we
don't lose it.

Comment 10 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-31 20:19:33 UTC
Present in FC5 too... fixed in yum CVS and will be in yum 2.9.4