Bug 200346 - installs two boot entries for the same kernel
installs two boot entries for the same kernel
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Anaconda Maintenance Team
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC6Blocker
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-07-26 21:10 EDT by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-16 23:00 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-31 16:19:33 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
install.log (43.74 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-27 13:05 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
anaconda.log (188.54 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-27 13:06 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
anaconda.xlog (46.56 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-27 13:07 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
anaconda.syslog (56.66 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-27 13:07 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Bill Nottingham 2006-07-26 21:10:25 EDT
Installing on a Thinkpad T40p today, I get:

Fedora Core (2.6.17-1.2449.fc6)
Fedora Core-up (2.6.17-1.2449.fc6)

in grub.

rawhide-20060726
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 12:47:44 EDT
That's ... odd.  Can you attach /root/anaconda.log and /var/log/anaconda*
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 13:05:27 EDT
Created attachment 133172 [details]
install.log
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 13:06:26 EDT
Created attachment 133173 [details]
anaconda.log
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 13:07:06 EDT
Created attachment 133174 [details]
anaconda.xlog
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 13:07:45 EDT
Created attachment 133176 [details]
anaconda.syslog
Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 13:18:05 EDT
Looking at anaconda.log, it appeared to add the kernel twice to the transaction
set - perhaps because I had kernel in %packages?
Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 13:30:55 EDT
Maybe.  Although I can't see why that would do it either :/
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2006-07-27 18:00:03 EDT
Confirmed on a second box - UP box + kernel in %packages == two entries.
Comment 9 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-27 18:04:48 EDT
That seems like the obvious reproducer.  Throwing on the blocker list so we
don't lose it.
Comment 10 Jeremy Katz 2006-07-31 16:19:33 EDT
Present in FC5 too... fixed in yum CVS and will be in yum 2.9.4

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.