Bug 2007220

Summary:	mangled changelog and NVR downgrade from f34 -> f35
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Component:	glusterfs-selinux	Assignee:	Shwetha K Acharya <sacharya>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	36	CC:	kkeithle, rkothiya, sacharya
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-06-22 12:52:05 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Fabio Valentini 2021-09-23 11:19:36 UTC

The changelog in the glusterfs-selinux package is mangled:

"""
%changelog
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering <releng> - 2.0.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

- Tagging glusterfs-selinux 2.0.1
* Tue Jul 6 2021 Shwetha K Acharya <sacharya>

* Wed Jan 27 2021 Rinku Kothiya <rkothiya> - 0.1.1-4
- Incorporated review comments - bz#1901123

(...)
"""

Additionally, the update to version 2.0.1 seems to have been made without decrementing Release or adding an appropriate changelog entry (like with rpmdev-bumpspec) on Fedora 34, which leads to the glusterfs-selinux package having a version that sorts higher on f34 than it does on f35.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2021-10-01 14:08:33 UTC

Why are you requesting needinfo from me without actually asking a question?

Comment 5 Fabio Valentini 2021-10-05 08:51:29 UTC

I don't know what you think you achieved with the commit you pushed, but it did not fix the broken changelog.

Also, just incrementing Release arbitrarily is not how this is supposed to work.
Every change in either Version or Release should be accompanied by a well-formatted %changelog entry.

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2021-10-05 19:24:21 UTC

What information do you need from me?

Comment 8 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:38:14 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 10 Fabio Valentini 2022-03-18 22:19:03 UTC

The issue is still there.

I also wonder why you "built the package for F37"?
When F37 was branched off of F36 (or rather, F36 was branched off of Rawhide, which is now F37), it inherited the previous build automatically.

Comment 12 Fabio Valentini 2022-03-22 21:49:21 UTC

... this is going nowhere.

Who sponsored you into the packager group? They should be the ones explaining this to you.

Comment 13 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2022-06-22 12:52:05 UTC

fixed on f35, f36, and rawhide/f37 branches