Bug 2007995
Summary: | Review Request: rust-yansi - Rust terminal color painting library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Baudisch <jan> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | michel, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | michel:
fedora-review?
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-05-03 21:21:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jan Baudisch
2021-09-26 20:55:27 UTC
Taking this review (removing the blocker on FE-NEEDSPONSOR since you're sponsored now!) One change request: so the %bcond_without you see at the top of the spec as generated by rust2rpm actually controls whether that flag is enabled or not, see https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/conditionalbuilds.html so: %bcond_without check means %{with check} by default, unless compiled --without check If the Rust compiler we have is too old for the test suite, then you just flip that definition to be %bcond_with check, and put a comment above it, no need to comment out the entire %check section This makes it easy to test locally if you think checks can be enabled again: fedpkg srpm (or rpmbuild -bs rust-yansi.spec) mock /path/to/rust-yansi-*.src.rpm --with check Thank you for pointing this out. I changed it and updated the spec and srpm. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2079341 *** |