Bug 2012515
| Summary: | Review Request: gtg - Personal organizer for the GNOME desktop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miguel <miguel7r.araujo> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gombosg, js-fedora, package-review, vitaly |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-08-25 00:45:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449 | ||
|
Description
Miguel
2021-10-10 00:39:10 UTC
Spec file LGTM. SRPM verified against upstream, hash matches with ArchLinux. Installed and works fine. > %{python3_sitelib}/* Such globing is not okay. Please follow the modern Python packaging guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_explicit_lists Changed ``%{python3_sitelib}/*`` to ``%{python3_sitelib}/GTG/``
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-35-x86_64/03062251-gtg/gtg.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-35-x86_64/03062251-gtg/gtg-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
Hey @miguel7r.araujo I'm trying to review your package. It doesn't seem to build on F36 for me. Error is: Configuring info.py using configuration GTG/plugins/meson.build:18:7: ERROR: i18n.merge_file got unknown keyword arguments "build_always_stale" Any idea why this is happening? Can you update the specfile to fix the build? Hello. I had a problem with my internet connection for the past couple months, so I just saw your comment now. I'll try to update the specfile to see if I can fix this problem. I have also seen that there is a new python-liblarch release, so I'll update liblarch and try to create an specfile for the newest release of gtg. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |