Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-34-x86_64/02882707-gtg/gtg.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-34-x86_64/02882707-gtg/gtg-0.5-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Getting Things GNOME! (GTG) is a personal organizer for the GNOME desktop environment inspired by the Getting Things Done (GTD) methodology. GTG is designed with flexibility, adaptability, and ease of use in mind so it can be used as more than just GTD software. Fedora Account System Username: miguel7ra This package was retired some time ago due to upstream inactivity but is active again.
Spec file LGTM. SRPM verified against upstream, hash matches with ArchLinux. Installed and works fine.
> %{python3_sitelib}/* Such globing is not okay. Please follow the modern Python packaging guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_explicit_lists
Changed ``%{python3_sitelib}/*`` to ``%{python3_sitelib}/GTG/`` Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-35-x86_64/03062251-gtg/gtg.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/miguel7ra/gtg/fedora-35-x86_64/03062251-gtg/gtg-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm
Hey @miguel7r.araujo I'm trying to review your package. It doesn't seem to build on F36 for me. Error is: Configuring info.py using configuration GTG/plugins/meson.build:18:7: ERROR: i18n.merge_file got unknown keyword arguments "build_always_stale" Any idea why this is happening? Can you update the specfile to fix the build?
Hello. I had a problem with my internet connection for the past couple months, so I just saw your comment now. I'll try to update the specfile to see if I can fix this problem. I have also seen that there is a new python-liblarch release, so I'll update liblarch and try to create an specfile for the newest release of gtg.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.