Bug 20172
Summary: | depmod errors when installing ext3 kernel. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat High Availability Server | Reporter: | Sam Varshavchik <mrsam> |
Component: | ext3 | Assignee: | Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | beta | CC: | copeland |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i586 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-05-07 21:32:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Red Hat Bugzilla
2000-11-02 01:06:18 UTC
I straced depmod, trying to pick up where that spurious message comes from, this is what I got: open("/lib/modules/2.2.17-6/.rhkmvtag", O_RDONLY) = 4 lseek(4, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0 read(4, "Linux version 2.2.17-6 (root@por"..., 52) = 52 write(2, "depmod: ", 8) = 8 write(2, "not an ELF file", 15) = 15 write(2, "\n", 1) = 1 close(4) Does depmod think that .rhkmvtag is a module??? You need a more recent modutils, indeed. I'm using 2.3.11-1 on 6.2 and 2.3.17-3 on 7.0. The "depmod: not an ELF file" is a warning that you can safely ignore, and has to do with the way depmod deals with the various files recent kernels leave in /lib/modules rather than ext3 itself. Unfortunately I can't do a dependency on modutils in the kernel RPM, because the existing modutils don't always supply an appropriately versioned "provides" symbol to key on. Assigned to our brave kernel builder, who knows far more than I about what tricks RPM can play to make sure that we have modutils running correctly. Is this still a problem? No. |