Bug 201830
| Summary: | package has failed dependency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | james |
| Component: | wv2 | Assignee: | Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5 | CC: | extras-qa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-08-09 12:24:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
No, libgsf-1.so.113 is correct and included in the libgsf-1.13.3-2.2.1 packages of FC5. Make sure you don't have Fedora Core Development enabled by accident. It includes a newer libgsf (114) and hence is incompatible. Package libgsf-1.13.3-2.2.1 appears to be obsolete - libgsf-1.14.1-4 is the current libgsf package. Somebody should update wv and wv2 to be consistent with the rest of FC5. Just don't enable Fedora Core Development when you want to keep FC5. There is no libgsf-1.14.1-4 for FC5, FC5 Released Updates or FC5 Test Updates. Ok, sure enough, libgsf-1.14.1-4 is from the development branch. The thing is, I _don't_ have the development repo enabled - except that I must have enabled that when I updated to the development gnucash, which grabs libgsf-1.14.1. This is sort of an rpm/yum issue, since the older libraries cannot be automatically installed, alone, as needed. But that simply leaves me going after the development versions of wv and wv2 - which exist. Simple enough. Sorry for the bother. |
Description of problem: error: Failed dependencies: libgsf-1.so.113 is needed by wv2-0.2.3-1.fc5.i386 Maybe they meant libgsf-1.so.1.13? Same for package "wv".