Bug 2020551

Summary: [4.8] the VERSION of 'oc get node' is not correct
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: MinLi <minmli>
Component: NodeAssignee: Josef Karasek <jkarasek>
Node sub component: Kubelet QA Contact: Sunil Choudhary <schoudha>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: medium CC: aos-bugs, harpatil, jokerman, maszulik, mfojtik
Version: 4.8   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-22 14:32:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description MinLi 2021-11-05 09:27:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
the VERSION of 'oc get node' is not correct.
for ocp 4.8, it should be 1.21.4, but now is 1.21.1. 

from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ac1LDNXd_BDgSduoLth_hMGqhd2P8CFpRrJjsaVsH8Q/edit#, it says: "Other z-streams are also affected, maybe with less consequences:
4.8: go.sum k8s.io/kubernetes v1.21.1, but we are on 1.21.4
4.7: go.sum k8s.io/kubernetes v1.20.0, but we are on 1.20.10"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8.19

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.$ oc get node 
NAME              STATUS   ROLES    AGE   VERSION
compute-0         Ready    worker   62m   v1.21.1+6438632
compute-1         Ready    worker   62m   v1.21.1+6438632
control-plane-0   Ready    master   73m   v1.21.1+6438632
control-plane-1   Ready    master   73m   v1.21.1+6438632
control-plane-2   Ready    master   73m   v1.21.1+6438632

2.$ oc version 
Client Version: 4.5.2
Server Version: 4.8.19
Kubernetes Version: v1.21.4+6438632

Actual results:
1. the VERSION is v1.21.1+6438632

Expected results:
1. the VERSION should be v1.21.4+6438632 as "Kubernetes Version" in step 2 

Additional info:
Comment 1 Maciej Szulik 2021-11-09 11:09:46 UTC 
Sending this over to Josef who was looking into solving that problem.
Comment 2 Maciej Szulik 2021-11-22 14:32:57 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2021997 ***