Bug 202291

Summary: rpmbuild fails for kernel-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5.src.rpm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ed <ed.temp.01>
Component: kernelAssignee: Dave Jones <davej>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: pfrields, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-14 14:11:15 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Ed 2006-08-12 03:00:36 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20060808 Fedora/ Firefox/ pango-text

Description of problem:
The following command sudo rpmbuild -bp --target=$(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec

fails. Here are the final lines of the console output

.config:3115:warning: trying to reassign symbol PCI_GODIRECT
.config:3115:warning: PCI_GODIRECT creates inconsistent choice state
.config:3116:warning: trying to reassign symbol PCI_GOXEN_FE
.config:3117:warning: trying to reassign symbol PCI_DIRECT
.config:3118:warning: trying to reassign symbol PCIEPORTBUS
.config:3119:warning: trying to reassign symbol NOHIGHMEM
.config:3120:warning: trying to reassign symbol HIGHMEM4G
.config:3121:warning: trying to reassign symbol HIGHMEM64G
.config:3121:warning: HIGHMEM64G creates inconsistent choice state
.config:3122:warning: trying to reassign symbol HIGHMEM
make[1]: *** [nonint_oldconfig] Error 1
make: *** [nonint_oldconfig] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21232 (%prep)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21232 (%prep)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm-ivh kernel-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5.src.rpm
2. cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/
3. sudo rpmbuild -bp --target=$(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec

Actual Results:
Failed as noted in description

Expected Results:
It should not have failed

Additional info:
Comment 1 Dave Jones 2006-08-14 14:11:15 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126342 ***