Bug 2024265

Summary:	java-17-openjdk as system JDK in F36
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ben Cotton <bcotton>
Component:	Changes Tracking	Assignee:	jiri vanek <jvanek>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	36	CC:	bcotton, decathorpe, jvanek, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-05-10 14:41:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2024881, 2041573, 2045699, 2045713, 2051124, 2051129, 2051132, 2051133, 2051135, 2051137, 2051138, 2051139, 2051140, 2051141, 2051142, 2051145, 2051147, 2051149, 2051150, 2051151, 2051152, 2051153, 2051155, 2051156, 2051158, 2051159, 2051161, 2051162, 2051163, 2051164, 2051166, 2051168, 2051170, 2051171, 2051172, 2051173, 2051174, 2051175, 2051176, 2051178, 2051180, 2051182, 2051183, 2051184, 2051185, 2051187, 2051188, 2051189, 2051190, 2051192, 2051193, 2051196, 2051197, 2051198, 2051200, 2051201, 2051202, 2051203, 2051204, 2051205, 2051206, 2051208, 2051209, 2051213, 2051214, 2051215, 2051216, 2051217, 2051219, 2051221, 2051223, 2051225, 2051226, 2051228, 2062407, 2104093
Bug Blocks:	1982279

Description Ben Cotton 2021-11-17 17:50:19 UTC

This is a tracking bug for Change: java-17-openjdk as system JDK in F36
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17

Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk.

If you encounter a bug related to this Change, please do not comment here. Instead create a new bug and set it to block this bug.

Comment 3 jiri vanek 2021-12-07 15:36:29 UTC

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/90

Comment 4 jiri vanek 2022-02-06 12:38:30 UTC

both
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-17-openjdk/pull-request/6
and
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-11-openjdk/pull-request/143
merged.

Mass rebuild runs  5th and 7th of February with aprox 65 failures in sidetag f36-java17. FTBFS will be filled.
Side tag considered healthy, and will be asked to merge.

Comment 5 jiri vanek 2022-02-06 12:39:21 UTC

Also whole javapackages and maven toolchain got merged to rawhide and built for f36-java17

Comment 6 jiri vanek 2022-02-07 12:41:00 UTC

Hello!

The side tag was merged.

Comment 7 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:06:34 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 8 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:15:06 UTC

Today we reached the Code Complete (testable) milestone in the F36 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

All code for this change should be complete enough for testing. You can indicate this by setting the bug status to MODIFIED. (If the code is fully complete, you can go ahead and set it to ON_QA.)

If you need to defer this Change to F37, please needinfo bcotton.

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2022-02-09 19:33:05 UTC

Since the side tag was merged, I'm setting this tracker bug to MODIFIED to indicate that it is testable.

Comment 10 Ben Cotton 2022-02-22 16:34:03 UTC

We have reached the 'Change complete (100% complete)' deadline in the Fedora Linux 36 release schedule.

At this time, all Changes should be fully complete. Indicate this by setting this tracking bug to ON_QA.

If you need to defer this Change to a subsequent release, please needinfo me.

Comment 11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2022-03-01 18:25:41 UTC

java-17-openjdk is the provider of /bin/javac in F36.
The packages that FTBFS can always be switched to use java-11-openjdk if they cannot be fixed
to build with 17.

Comment 12 Ben Cotton 2022-05-10 14:41:45 UTC

F36 was released today. If this Change did not land in the release, please notify bcotton as soon as possible.

Comment 13 Fabio Valentini 2022-05-16 22:09:03 UTC

I wonder if this change can actually be considered "completed"?
For example, openjdk packages do not get changed from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk when upgrading from Fedora 35 to 36, which is a bit unexpected.