Bug 202596
Summary: | mkinitrd not loading raid456 module for raid5 devices | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734> | ||||||
Component: | mkinitrd | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | davej, jturner, notting | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-17 18:33:57 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 150224, 202996 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Clyde E. Kunkel
2006-08-15 13:15:16 UTC
Created attachment 134209 [details]
mkinitrd -f -v without specifying any modules to load
Created attachment 134210 [details]
mkinitrd -f -v --with=raid456
The patch in bug 202559 fixes this as a side effect. What in the world happened with this bug. It was a RHEL5 bug with a beta blocker status requested, but now it's a FC bug which has been closed out. Is this still an issue with RHEL5? More importantly, is this an issue which needs to be resolved for beta? If so, we really need a RHEL version of the bug to track things. OK, ignore comment 5. I see this was cloned to another bug for RHEL. I am seeing this bug for mkinitrd-5.0.32-2 when updating FC5 to kernel 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp. Reruning mkinitrd under an older FC5 kernel and using --with=raid456 solves the problem. Should this bug be reopened or a new bug entered? Open a new one, please. found one already opened: bug 211030. |