Bug 2026839

Summary: NSCA package doesn't define firewalld service
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Todd Taft <taft>
Component: nscaAssignee: Xavier Bachelot <xavier>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: marianne, wart, xavier
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Draft of /usr/lib/firewalld/services/nsca.xml none

Description Todd Taft 2021-11-26 06:27:44 UTC
Created attachment 1843667 [details]
Draft of /usr/lib/firewalld/services/nsca.xml

Description of problem:
When the nsca package is installed, a service definition is not added to the firewalld configuration

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nsca-2.10.0-2.el7

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install nsca
2. firewall-cmd --info-service=nsca

Actual results:
Error: INVALID_SERVICE: nsca

Expected results:
nsca
  ports: 5667/tcp
  protocols: 
  source-ports: 
  modules: 
  destination: 
  includes: 
  helpers: 

Additional info:
There is some precedent for other packages defining firewalld services if the service definition isn't included with firewalld.  e.g. munin-node-2.0.66-1.el7.noarch installs /usr/lib/firewalld/services/munin-node.xml

Draft of /usr/lib/firewalld/services/nsca.xml is attached.