Bug 202904
Summary: | Anaconda load failure with bug report | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Norris <p-m-norris> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5 | CC: | robatino | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-22 23:49:53 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Paul Norris
2006-08-16 23:42:15 UTC
Created attachment 134356 [details]
Anaconda bug report
Before this bug is closed as NOTABUG (due to the error message coming from the CD drive masquerading as a hardware bug) I should mention that I've also experienced this problem, and that the same machine, after repeated failed installs of FC5, installed FC4 with no problems on the first try. There have been many reports of this type associated with FC5, and it's just not plausible that all these machines suddenly started having hardware problems when FC5 came out, and that the problem goes away when FC4 is installed. Thanks Andre for comments. Can you please advise me how you reached your conclusion? I'm reasonably skilled in plain vanilla software (Pascal prefered!) but as I'm only just trying to convert to Linux and I haven't yet discovered the delights of the Source code (if its written in C, I'm all at sea). If assembler I might be able to follow the logic slowly. The disk unit in question is an LG DRD-8160B DVD-ROM or the GCE-8160B CD-Rewriter). I'm trying to convert my old PII-400 on Intel SR440BX MB, 256 Ram and 8GB disk into something useful. XP will not run and W98 is now to claggy (and unsupported)! Unfortunately will not support the DVD to boot so have to use the CD to load. Thanks again Paul N The messages I'm referring to are <4>hdc: command error: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } <4>hdc: command error: error=0x54 { AbortedCommand LastFailedSense=0x05 } <4>ide: failed opcode was: unknown <4>end_request: I/O error, dev hdc, sector 588 <3>Buffer I/O error on device hdc, logical block 147 where hdc is <4>hdc: LG DVD-ROM DRD-8160B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive There have been many bug reports of this type and the above messages are always interpreted as meaning that there's a hardware problem with the drive, and the bug is closed. The problem, as I said above, is that it only affects a FC5 install. You could probably try to install FC5 10 times, each time having the same problem, then install FC4 successfully on the first try. It's not the hardware, no matter how much it looks like it. Thanks for info. I've just spent a fruitless 30 mins trying to find an FC4 Download site on Fedora Wiki. It seems to have been wiped from the face of the earth! I do have a bootable Core1 that came with the "Linux for Dummies" (that my level at the moment. I suppose that might be better than nix. However I thought that newer releases would be better! thanks Paul You should try installing from your other drive (the GCE-8160B) if you're using CDs (you may have to make this drive bootable in your BIOS), or if you have broadband, you could try a network install. FC5 is definitely an improvement over FC4 IF you can install it. I should also mention that I was able to install on my problem machine after temporarily putting in a different drive. So you would have a decent chance of success using your other drive. Thanks for help. spent six hours down-loading fc-4-i386-DVD.iso which my machine would not accept as a boot disk!Disk E is the DVD-ROM and is IDE Master. System would only boot of CD-ROM in that disk. So loaded fc-5-i386-disk1.iso using "Linux askmethod". Selected CDROM option and put disk1 in Drive F, the CD-ROM and IDE Slave and off it went. Now have FC-5 installed so I can start learning about Linux. General comment, the loader asks all sort of questions which assume a fairly deep knowledge of the system before you can even start! eg how Linux identifies disk partions and what a root is! Still some way to go yet before loading Fedora Linux is as simple as loading Windows. Admittedly since I had a dual system made it more complex but I now have Linux and Windows98 together (XP would not touch this machine as it's only a PII/400 with 256MB ram and 8GB disk. Do I have to report that it failed to run the on-board sound chip? it's a Sound Blaster AudioPCI 64V PC98 compliant. Please advise Paul Norris You'll have to google or search Bugzilla for this problem; I'm not familiar with that hardware but it's probably been reported before. Good luck. That message is always caused by a failing hardware component somewhere. While sometimes it will work with other versions or distributions, that just ends up meaning that the timing is marginally better and thus doesn't tickle a) bad drive/media interactions b) cable problems or c) other small hardware issues I have an eMachine with a Samsung SCR-3232 CD-ROM drive, and my father has two similar eMachines, both with Samsung SCR-2432 drives. All 3 machines could install FC4 successfully, none could install FC5 using the original drives, though the type of media used was exactly the same before and after in each case. Since the drives are clearly physically capable of reading the media, the sudden inability to read it properly with the FC5 installer must be the installer's fault. Well-written drivers are supposed to do the best possible job of making use of the hardware, (_even if it's flaky_), which isn't happening here. |