Bug 2030925

Summary:	Please build libsidplayfp for EPEL 9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	libsidplayfp	Assignee:	Karel Volný <kvolny>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	bugs.michael, hdegoede, kvolny
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-01-07 01:26:13 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2035407
Bug Blocks:

Description Robert Scheck 2021-12-10 01:36:34 UTC

Description of problem:
Please build libsidplayfp for EPEL 9, because it's a dependency of the audacious-plugins package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.fc36

Actual results:
No libsidplayfp in EPEL 9.

Expected results:
libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.el9 - or better ;-)

Additional info:
Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on EPEL 9 branch.

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 08:48:28 UTC

I'm sorry but I don't have time to maintain EPEL branches for my packages. I do always welcome co-maintainers who wish to maintain, please let me know if you want to be added as a co-maintainer to the libsidplayfp package.

I believe that your FAS login is "robert", right ?

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 08:49:31 UTC

I'm sorry but I don't have time to maintain EPEL branches for my packages. I do always welcome co-maintainers who wish to maintain, please let me know if you want to be added as a co-maintainer to the libsidplayfp package.

I believe that your FAS login is "robert", right ?

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2021-12-10 09:17:24 UTC

That's correct. And thank you for accepting me as co-maintainer :)

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 09:28:21 UTC

Ok, I've added you as a co-maintainer now.

Comment 5 Karel Volný 2021-12-16 10:06:18 UTC

just a note ... I believe sidplayfp should go along

I've requested the branch
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39748

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-12-29 05:12:03 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-12-30 02:21:10 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-01-03 14:29:08 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-01-04 00:27:10 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-01-07 01:26:13 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-01-12 00:56:01 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.