Bug 2030925 - Please build libsidplayfp for EPEL 9
Summary: Please build libsidplayfp for EPEL 9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: libsidplayfp
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Karel Volný
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2035407
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-10 01:36 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2022-01-12 00:56 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-01-07 01:26:13 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2021-12-10 01:36:34 UTC
Description of problem:
Please build libsidplayfp for EPEL 9, because it's a dependency of the audacious-plugins package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.fc36

Actual results:
No libsidplayfp in EPEL 9.

Expected results:
libsidplayfp-2.3.1-1.el9 - or better ;-)

Additional info:
Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on EPEL 9 branch.

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 08:48:28 UTC
I'm sorry but I don't have time to maintain EPEL branches for my packages. I do always welcome co-maintainers who wish to maintain, please let me know if you want to be added as a co-maintainer to the libsidplayfp package.

I believe that your FAS login is "robert", right ?

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 08:49:31 UTC
I'm sorry but I don't have time to maintain EPEL branches for my packages. I do always welcome co-maintainers who wish to maintain, please let me know if you want to be added as a co-maintainer to the libsidplayfp package.

I believe that your FAS login is "robert", right ?

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2021-12-10 09:17:24 UTC
That's correct. And thank you for accepting me as co-maintainer :)

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2021-12-10 09:28:21 UTC
Ok, I've added you as a co-maintainer now.

Comment 5 Karel Volný 2021-12-16 10:06:18 UTC
just a note ... I believe sidplayfp should go along

I've requested the branch
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39748

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-12-29 05:12:03 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-12-30 02:21:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-01-03 14:29:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-01-04 00:27:10 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-01-07 01:26:13 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-668d6f0fc3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-01-12 00:56:01 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d266e895a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.