Bug 2034169
| Summary: | EPEL9 branch of perl-PPIx-Utils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Howarth <paul> |
| Component: | perl-PPIx-Utils | Assignee: | Paul Howarth <paul> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | rc040203 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | perl-PPIx-Utils-0.003-3.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-01-14 01:40:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2034173 | ||
|
Description
Paul Howarth
2021-12-20 10:11:03 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build perl-PPIx-Utils in epel9? I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9. I've added you as "collaborator" and bugzilla contact for epel* Thanks Ralf. I requested an epel9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40387 Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work. (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work. It's what I guessed from this hardly usable web-GUI, but don't know, either ;) (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > > Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work. > It's what I guessed from this hardly usable web-GUI, but don't know, either > ;) I'm pleased to say it worked. Could you please do the same for the following packages? perl-Want (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429) perl-Regexp-Common (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815) perl-Perl-MinimumVersion (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173) perl-Return-Type (no BZ yet) perl-Type-Tiny (please add me as collaborator in addition to Petr) (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430) perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (no BZ yet) perl-Type-Tie (no BZ yet) perl-Sub-Infix (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348) perl-Validation-Class (no BZ yet) If you'd prefer that I raise tickets for the "no BZ yet" packages, let me know and I'll do it. (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #5) > perl-Want (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429) EPEL already exists and is owned by Lubomir Rintel. I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Regexp-Common (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815) EPEL already exists and is owned by Xavier Lamien. I've added you as "collaborator" > perl-Perl-MinimumVersion > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173) Already done (IIRC, yesterday). > perl-Return-Type (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Type-Tiny (please add me as collaborator in addition to Petr) > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430) I had assigned perl-Type-Tiny to Xavier B. (IIRC, yesterday), because it was him, who requested it. Nevertheless, I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Type-Tie (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Sub-Infix (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348) Already assigned to Xavier B. Nevertheless, I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Validation-Class (no BZ yet) Done. > If you'd prefer that I raise tickets for the "no BZ yet" packages, let me > know and I'll do it. Cf. above. I prefer keeping things simple. The amount of bureaucracy these EPEL-requests have already is beyond reason, plus the usability und bugginess of https://src.fedoraproject.org only deserves one attribute: "crap". FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Hi Ralf, another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could you add me please? (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #9) > Hi Ralf, > > another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for > perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could > you add me please? Done - BTW, this is one of the dozens if not hundreds of packages which have lost "perl-sig" :( (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #10) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #9) > > another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for > > perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could > > you add me please? > Done - BTW, this is one of the dozens if not hundreds of packages which have > lost "perl-sig" :( Thanks. The perl-sig commit access doesn't seem to help with branching anyway. I tried requesting the epel9 branch for perl-Sub-Infix (which has commit access for perl-sig) but that didn't work (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40356), hence my request for access to that package earlier. Hi Ralf, another one please: perl-Test-Script Done. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |