Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
I would like an EPEL9 branch of perl-PPIx-Utils as part of the dependency tree for perl-Test-MinimumVersion (Bug #2034030). Since you don't do any EPEL packaging, could you please add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package so that I can do it myself?
Will you be able to branch and build perl-PPIx-Utils in epel9? I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9.
I've added you as "collaborator" and bugzilla contact for epel*
Thanks Ralf. I requested an epel9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40387 Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work.
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work. It's what I guessed from this hardly usable web-GUI, but don't know, either ;)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > > Hopefully "collaborator" status is sufficient for this to work. > It's what I guessed from this hardly usable web-GUI, but don't know, either > ;) I'm pleased to say it worked. Could you please do the same for the following packages? perl-Want (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429) perl-Regexp-Common (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815) perl-Perl-MinimumVersion (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173) perl-Return-Type (no BZ yet) perl-Type-Tiny (please add me as collaborator in addition to Petr) (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430) perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (no BZ yet) perl-Type-Tie (no BZ yet) perl-Sub-Infix (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348) perl-Validation-Class (no BZ yet) If you'd prefer that I raise tickets for the "no BZ yet" packages, let me know and I'll do it.
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #5) > perl-Want (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429) EPEL already exists and is owned by Lubomir Rintel. I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Regexp-Common (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815) EPEL already exists and is owned by Xavier Lamien. I've added you as "collaborator" > perl-Perl-MinimumVersion > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173) Already done (IIRC, yesterday). > perl-Return-Type (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Type-Tiny (please add me as collaborator in addition to Petr) > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430) I had assigned perl-Type-Tiny to Xavier B. (IIRC, yesterday), because it was him, who requested it. Nevertheless, I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Type-Tie (no BZ yet) Done. > perl-Sub-Infix (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348) Already assigned to Xavier B. Nevertheless, I've added you as "collaborator". > perl-Validation-Class (no BZ yet) Done. > If you'd prefer that I raise tickets for the "no BZ yet" packages, let me > know and I'll do it. Cf. above. I prefer keeping things simple. The amount of bureaucracy these EPEL-requests have already is beyond reason, plus the usability und bugginess of https://src.fedoraproject.org only deserves one attribute: "crap".
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Hi Ralf, another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could you add me please?
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #9) > Hi Ralf, > > another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for > perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could > you add me please? Done - BTW, this is one of the dozens if not hundreds of packages which have lost "perl-sig" :(
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #10) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #9) > > another one for you please. Somehow I'm EPEL contact for > > perl-Test-MinimumVersion but don't have collaborator access for it. Could > > you add me please? > Done - BTW, this is one of the dozens if not hundreds of packages which have > lost "perl-sig" :( Thanks. The perl-sig commit access doesn't seem to help with branching anyway. I tried requesting the epel9 branch for perl-Sub-Infix (which has commit access for perl-sig) but that didn't work (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40356), hence my request for access to that package earlier.
Hi Ralf, another one please: perl-Test-Script
Done.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-51fdf411d9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.