Bug 2035991 (license-validate-audit)

Summary: Tracking of license-validate audit
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: distributionAssignee: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Status: ASSIGNED --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: kevin, mhroncok, rfontana
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Tracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2035992, 2035996, 2035999, 2036000, 2036001, 2036035, 2036036, 2036037, 2036038, 2036039, 2036064, 2036066, 2036067, 2036068, 2036070, 2036071, 2036072, 2036074, 2036075, 2036076, 2036077, 2036078, 2036127, 2036136, 2036203    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2021-12-29 06:52:56 UTC
I am going to run 
  license-validate
for all SPEC files in Fedora.

I will use this tracking BZ to track all violations of our licensing.

The violation are expected to be incorrect use of short names from

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2021-12-29 16:28:03 UTC
Mirek, could you please include package names in the summaries of the reported bugzillas, so when I hover over them, I could see what package they are for? Thanks.

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2021-12-29 21:45:58 UTC
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> Mirek, could you please include package names in the summaries of the
> reported bugzillas, so when I hover over them, I could see what package they
> are for? Thanks.

I will do.