Bug 2036075

Summary:	Unknown license ASL 2.0 with exceptions
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component:	flang	Assignee:	serge_sans_paille <sguelton>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	36	CC:	rfontana, sguelton
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-10-04 13:35:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2035991

Description Miroslav Suchý 2021-12-29 16:35:07 UTC

flang.spec contains
  License: ASL 2.0 with exceptions
But there is no such short name at
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
Can you clarify it and use propper short name?

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:18:18 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 2 Richard Fontana 2022-07-28 05:11:38 UTC

Under application of the new guidelines, I think this would be something like:

License: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM_exception

%package doc
License: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception AND BSD-2-Clause AND MIT

However, I don't think we've officially approved the use of the LLVM exception. 
I've submitted this issue: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/45

Comment 3 serge_sans_paille 2022-10-04 13:35:44 UTC

It's been renamed as "License: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception" in flang-15.0.0